AI discovery for service businesses
See who appears
in AI answers.
Compare the offers.
Decide what to work on next.
Start with your service and the places you actually serve. The review tests three buyer questions and gives you saved answers, sourced comparisons where available, and evidence for what to keep, check or improve.
From our own product test
06 SEP 2026 · API SAMPLEOne buyer question
The same question.
Different answers.
Which providers specialize in bookkeeping for therapists and mental health practitioners remotely for customers in United States, and who are they best suited for?
Remote service United States
Lucori Bookkeeping
Three completed answers to the question shown.
| API method | Business name | Website source |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAIAstra · web search | No name match | Not returned |
| ClaudeSonnet · web search | No name match | Not returned |
| PerplexitySonar · integrated search | Name matched | Returned |
Each result describes this saved answer only. A name match and a website source are separate observations.
Read the matched answer excerpt & method details
From the Perplexity Sonar answer
Lucori Bookkeeping — Best suited for therapists who want a smaller, therapist-specific bookkeeper serving clients throughout the United States.[4]
The link opens the business page cited in this answer. The quoted description is the API’s assessment; we have not independently verified service quality, suitability or capacity.
What was tested
The exact question above was sent without Lucori’s name or domain. This comparison shows one of the three questions in our completed test.
- OpenAI:
gpt-6-astra, Responses API with native web search. - Claude:
claude-sonnet-4-6, native web search. - Perplexity:
sonar, integrated search; actual search use was not separately reported.
Sample requests started September 6, 2026 at 16:03 UTC. OpenAI and Claude confirmed search use. All three answers completed successfully.
One saved API answer per method for this question. Consumer apps were not tested; answers can change. This is our own research using a public website. Lucori is not a customer or endorser.
From question to next step
Less guesswork.
More to work with.
For service-business owners who want to understand what appeared, inspect the evidence and know what to work on next.
Full review · $50, one timeGet the question right.
Confirm your service, how you deliver it and up to three actual markets. Preview three customer questions for free before any discovery run starts.
See the answers for yourself.
The full review plans nine answers: three questions across three API methods. Inspect name matches, returned website sources and other businesses alongside the saved answers.
Leave with a practical next step.
Use a sourced business fact brief and supported offer comparisons to decide what matters. When website evidence supports a change, get up to three tasks with steps and a way to check your work. Some reports justify no website change.
Planned methods: OpenAI Astra with native web search, Claude with native web search, and Perplexity with integrated search. These are point-in-time API samples, not consumer-app rankings or a complete market survey. Failed answers are unavailable, not evidence that your business is absent.
The standard behind the research
A good review knows
what to keep.
Your website may already have the answer. In our earlier manual research, checking real pages meant keeping useful pricing, finding existing onboarding instructions and withdrawing an unnecessary form recommendation.
Read the earlier website researchThree public bookkeeping websites, manually reviewed September 6, 2026 UTC using a different method. These are research examples, not customers or endorsers.
Recommendations are yours to review and implement. The pilot does not edit your site or promise rankings, AI mentions or business results. See the full scope →